Monday, April 1, 2013

Integrated Reporting: a solution for annual reporting? (Interview of Teodorina Lessidrenska)

Every year, most of the organizations released their annual reports, in which their financial situation is presented. Is that what stakeholders are expected? Yes, but not only. Can anyone understand annual reports? Not really… Transparency is key in nowadays communication, but that must imply accessibility of information: communication of information must be made in such manner that anyone can reach it and understand it. Today, stakeholders are expected to see organizations they follow to be committed into not only economic issues but also initiatives related to environmental and social initiatives; that is to say, see that corporate responsibility is actually taken into account by these organizations. Sustainability reports are a mean for organizations to communicate on such issues. However, cumulating many reports may discourage them… Integrated report might be a solution! Teodorina Lessidrenska (co-author of Transient Caretakers with Mervyn E. King) is explaining us what benefits Integrated Reporting can bring to organizations.
 
 

  1. Why organizations should release reports related to sustainability issues?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: We live in a world where transparency is a must for a company to establish and maintain the trust of its employee and investors, clients, suppliers, governmental and non-governmental stakeholders and the society as a whole. By releasing reports on company’s governance and ethical aspects and environmental, social, and economic performance, a company is earning the trust of its stakeholders and maintains the constructive dialogue and engagement with its stakeholders. Such trust and dialogue are necessary not only for good reputation but also for attracting clients, improvement in products and services and positioning to better address potential and real risks and opportunities.

After more than a decade expansion of the practice of sustainability reporting worldwide, the expectations for the quality of the reports have grown significantly. It is not enough just to fill in with data your sustainability report, but a good report must provide the necessary information to the company’s stakeholders needed for them to make informed decisions concerning the company, its products, services, its market value and its ability to create and sustain value.

Today the value of the company has become inseparable from its intangible assets such as for example leadership, strategy, reputation, talent and how they play part in company’s sustainability strategy and in the relationships between company and its stakeholders. The ability of a company to communicate, analyze, and use internally the reported sustainability information for development of sustainability strategy and improvement of the company’s performance is as important as its ability to communicate in a report this information externally to its various stakeholders and to use it as a platform for engagement and dialogue with them.

  1. Could you explain briefly, what is Integrated Reporting and what are the aims?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: The aim of the International Integrated Reporting Framework is to support the development of and transition towards a new form of company reporting – the Integrated Reporting.

In the words of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), Integrated Reporting brings together the material information about an organization’s strategy, governance, performance and prospects in a way that reflects the commercial, social and environmental context within which it operates. It provides a clear and concise representation of how an organization creates value, now and in the future. Integrated Reporting combines the most material elements of information presented in separate reports and other documents (financial report and sustainability report, management commentary, governance and remuneration documents, etc.) in a coherent whole, and importantly:
        shows the connectivity between them; and
        explains how they affect the ability of an organization to create and sustain value in the short, medium and long term.

  1. The Integrated Reporting standards are being released in April 2013 and GRI 4 in May 2013. What are the differences between the Integrated Reporting standards and GRI?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: The GRI and the GRI Sustainability Reporting Framework are globally recognized and accepted as the standard for sustainability reporting, that enables all organizations to measure and report their economic, environmental, social and governance performance – the four key areas of sustainability. As part of the guidance on development of sustainability report, the GRI offers companies guidance on how to identify material sustainability topics to be monitored and managed, and to prepare for the integrated thinking process, which is the foundation for integrated reporting. According to the GRI, sustainability reporting process defined by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Framework can help companies that want to produce integrated reports, in three main ways:
        Identifying material topics – topics that express the core link between business goals and sustainability impacts
        Stakeholder engagement – dialogue to help determine material impacts and manage risks and opportunities
        Performance indicators – measuring, managing and reporting material issues using an internationally accepted framework

The GRI is the platform for development of sustainability report by an organization, and together with the financial report and other relevant governance documentation it provides the base for development of organization’s Integrated Report. One of the G4 development objectives for May 2013 set by GRI’s Board of Directors is to offer guidance on “how to link the sustainability reporting process to the preparation of an integrated report aligned with the guidance to be developed by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)”.

To develop an Integrated Report an organization must have a sustainability report, a financial report, governance documents and other documents and must use the information provided in these reports as a base for its Integrated Report development. According to IIRC, Integrated Reporting reflects what can be called “integrated thinking” – application of the collective mind of those charged with governance (the board of directors or equivalent), and the ability of management, to monitor, manage and communicate the full complexity of the value-creation process, and how this contributes to success over time. It will increasingly be through this process of “integrated thinking” that organizations are able to create and sustain value. The effective communication of this process can help investors, and other stakeholders, to understand not only an organization’s past and current performance, but also its future resilience. The main output of Integrated Reporting is an Integrated Report: a single report that the IIRC anticipates will become an organization’s primary report, backed up by separate more detailed sustainability report, financial report and other documents which also will be available.

  1. Do you think that with the Integrated Reporting framework, organizations will communicate more on sustainability issues?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: The current experience of companies in South Africa and globally issuing Integrated Reports, and the recommendations of the IIRC and the IR Framework confirm that an integrated report is built on quality sustainability and financial reporting. Based on the information provided in the sustainability and financial reports, the company Board develops an Integrated report that presents the company’s strategy and goals, what values are created by the company and how, what are the risks and opportunities and ways they will be addressed in a long and short-term by the company, etc. Thus for the purpose of meeting the high quality information needs of Integrated reporting, companies won’t have other choice but to improve their sustainability reporting and communicate more and better on sustainability issues.

  1. You are participating to many seminars and conferences in Turkey since 2006, so regarding sustainability issues how the business environment has evolved since then?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: During the past 6-7 years the business in Turkey has deepened the dialogue on the sustainability concept and issues in relation with the local context, and has developed tools and capacity to begin addressing the relevant and most pressing sustainability issues. However, among the main remaining challenges still is effective engagement of the Turkish business community with its various stakeholders in Turkey on building a common sustainability agenda, and for the individual Turkish companies – the remaining challenge is establishment of constructive dialogue and engagement with their stakeholders on finding practical solutions to specific sustainability issues and problems.

  1. What would be your top 5 advice for an organization to get ready to report based on the Integrated Reporting framework?
Teodorina Lessidrenska:
1)      Improve the quality of your sustainability reports by better more comprehensive coverage and analysis of the issues material for the company and its stakeholders, by clear presentation of goals and targets and by monitoring of and communication on progress towards these targets.

2)      Deepen the analysis on: how each of the sustainability issues is relevant to the financial performance of the company; what are the sustainability risks and opportunities and how they are linked to the financial, economic, commercial and other risks, opportunities and business performance; how stakeholder expectations and needs can be translated into product and service improvement and innovation, etc.

3)      Set up a sustainability reporting process that enables not just collection of environmental, social and other sustainability data within the company, but also ensures effective engagement with the key stakeholders and getting their regular input on the sustainability issues, priorities and strategic directions of the company.

4)      Ensure and strengthen the participation of the top management, CEO, CFO, Strategy, Product and Innovation Executives, and the members of the Board in the development of the sustainability report and most importantly – in the analysis and integrated application of sustainability information for development of company strategy that incorporates the financial and extra-financial aspects and their impact on company’s long-term and short-term performance and value creation.

5)      Develop and use efficiently the Internet as a platform for reporting and interaction with stakeholders

  1. According to your opinion, what should be the role “sustainability” within companies’ and organizations’ communication strategies?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: The communication strategy more and more will include strategic stakeholder communications and engagement with a wider range of stakeholders on sustainability issues. It will go beyond just sustainability reporting and will incorporate ongoing dialogue and strategic focused consultations with specific key stakeholders on specific sustainability issues.

  1. How can be companies/brands/organizations act as role models towards general public regarding sustainability issues?
Teodorina Lessidrenska:
·         Be honest about your successes, challenges and failure and openly talk about them
·         Commit to things you can do, act upon them, and deliver
·         The things you can’t do at this time – don’t drop or hide them, but analyze further possible solutions, engage with stakeholders and come up with way and concrete steps forward
·         Use every opportunity for collaboration
·         Define how your company currently contributes for creation of value for the society, and potential areas and ways it can create social value, develop these areas as platforms for innovation so your products and services expand and become more profitable while at the same time they address better the needs of your stakeholders and the society.
·         Make sustainability, integration and integrated thinking your signature brand

  1. Is there any other issue that you would like to underline?
Teodorina Lessidrenska: One of the main factors for successful adoption of sustainability and integrated reporting is establishment of reliable and trusted system and platform for assurance/verification of the sustainability, financial and integrated reports. The lack of proper generally accepted assurance system for sustainability reports is have had negative impact on the quality and wider application of the sustainability reports.

Equally important and challenging factor for the successful uptake of the Integrated Reporting is balanced multistakeholder participation in the IR development and application. This means that civil society and governmental institutions must be involved in the IIRC pilot programs together with business, so organizations of all types, from all sectors and sizes, must start developing sustainability and integrated reports.

Integrated Reporting: a solution for annual reporting? (Interview of Mervyn E. King)

By Tina LY.
Every year, most of the organizations released their annual reports, in which their financial situation is presented. Is that what stakeholders are expected? Yes, but not only. Can anyone understand annual reports? Not really… Transparency is key in nowadays communication, but that must imply accessibility of information: communication of information must be made in such manner that anyone can reach it and understand it. Today, stakeholders are expected to see organizations they follow to be committed into not only economic issues but also initiatives related to environmental and social initiatives; that is to say, see that corporate responsibility is actually taken into account by these organizations. Sustainability reports are a mean for organizations to communicate on such issues. However, cumulating many reports may discourage them… Integrated report might be a solution! Mervyn E. King - former Chairman of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and currently Chairman of International Integrated Reporting Committee - is explaining us what benefits Integrated Reporting can bring to organizations.
 

1.       Why organizations should release reports related to sustainability issues?
Mervyn E. King: Sustainability reports are critical because every company uses natural assets and the company is itself part of society and not apart from society. Further, one is dealing with stakeholders and a company needs to know its key stakeholders’ legitimate needs, interests and expectations in order to strategize on an informed basis. Sustainability issues relevant to the business of a company as water is to the beverage manufacturer, is critical in developing strategy. It is also critical so that the reader of a report knows that the board has applied its collective mind to the sustainability issues, such as water, to ensure that the company will continue to sustain value creation.
2.       Could you explain briefly, what is Integrated Reporting and what are the aims?
Mervyn E. King: The integrated report is to make a report in concise, clear and understandable language. To be accountable the report must be understandable. It must also be understandable to the person in the street because it is no longer merely the wealthy family who provides capital to companies. A large provider of capital today is in fact the pension fund which is the money of the average individual who is also the consumer. The trustees of pension funds need to make an informed assessment that the equity of the company in which they are investing, the ultimate beneficiaries’ money, is carrying on a sustainable business.
3.       The Integrated Reporting standards are being released in April 2013 and GRI 4 in May 2013. What are the differences between the Integrated Reporting standards and GRI?
Mervyn E. King: The GRI sets standards for sustainability reporting whilst integrating reporting does not have standards. It is merely a framework which sets out the content elements and how you should word an integrated report containing the material financial and non-financial issues, showing how the one impacts on the other and how you have embedded sustainability into your long term strategy. It is a framework in which the company tells its stakeholders “the state of play” in a company.
4.       You are participating to many seminars and conferences in Turkey since 2006, so regarding sustainability issues how the business environment has evolved since then?
Teodorina and I have been at many seminars and conferences in Turkey since 2006. There is, without question, an important improvement where businesses more and more are seeing sustainability issues in the light of performance as a business initiative, not a “do good” factor.
5.       What would be your top 5 advice for an organization to get ready to report based on the Integrated Reporting framework?
Mervyn E. King: The most important issue is for the collective mind of the board to be informed of the needs, interests and expectations of key stakeholders, what are the value drivers of the business, what are the sustainability issues material to the business, how are these embedded into long term strategy and how is the company meeting the needs, interests and expectations of stakeholders?
6.       According to your opinion, what should be the role “sustainability” within companies’ and organizations’ communication strategies?
Mervyn E. King: Communication is a critical issue today with companies. Strategic communication with stakeholders is absolutely important so that management can be informed about stakeholders’ expectations. This drives management to manage on a more informed basis and develop strategy on a more informed basis for the board. The board at each board meeting has reports on stakeholder relationships with the company and is consequently more informed on deciding on strategy.
7.       How can be companies/brands/organizations act as role models towards general public regarding sustainability issues?
Mervyn E. King: Companies today have to be, and be seen to be, good corporate citizens, otherwise stakeholders, particularly civil society, will reject the company. Civil society no longer accepts that companies can profit at the expense of human rights, or by adverse impacts on society or the environment. Google Nestle and the KitKat campaign by Greenpeace as an example.
8.       Is there any other issue that you would like to underline?
Mervyn E. King: The only issue I would like to underline is that integrated reporting is the future and management can no longer think in silos. One has to think across the six resources used by every company: financial, manufactured, human, natural, intellectual and social capitals, and the relationship with key stakeholders. Integrated thinking is thinking across those resources and the relationships in managing and developing strategy. The resources and relationships are interrelated, interconnected and interdependent in the functions and operations of a company.

Markalar finansal raporlarına sürdürülebilirliği de eklemeli

Tina LY.

Her yıl veya her dönem sonunda şirketler, finansal performansları hakkında bilgi veren yıllık raporlarını açıklar. Bu şirketlerin paydaşlarının beklentilerini karşılar ama tam anlamıyla değil. Günümüzde iletişim, şeffaflıkla eşit formata gelmiştir. Daha da önemlisi, günümüzde paydaşlar, yani özellikle tüketiciler şirketlerin finansal performansı hakkında bilgiye erişmekten ötesinde doğa ve sosyal konularda attıkları adımlar hakkında da detaylı bilgiye sahip olmayı istemekteler.
Sürdürülebilirlik konusunda global ölçekte otorite olarak kabul edilen GRI Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Mervyn E. King’in bu noktada bir çözüm önerisi bulunuyor. King’e göre, şirketler finansal raporlarına sürdürülebilirlik performanslarını da katarak entegre raporlar oluşturmaya başlamalı. Mervyn King konu hakkında sorularımızı cevapladı:


Şirketler neden sürdürülebilirlik raporu yayınlamalı?
Şirketler toplumdan ayrı değillerdir ve toplumların birer parçasıdırlar. Şirketler, paydaşlarıyla sürekli olarak etkileşim halinde olmalıdır. Paydaşlarının meşru ihtiyaçlarını, çıkarları ve gereksinimlerini belli bir sistem dâhilinde öğrenmeleri ve karşılamak için stratejilerini kurgulamaları gerekmektedir.
Sürdürülebilirlik aslında, bir içecek üreticisi için suyun arz ettiği önem gibi tanımlanabilir. Sürdürülebilirlik raporunun bir önemi daha vardır. Okuyan kişi yani paydaş, yani tüketici söz konusu şirket veya markanın değer yaratmak için uzun soluklu bir çaba içinde olduğunu görür. Bu da elbette şirkete pozitif yansır.

Entegre raporlama standartlarından ve amaçlarından bahsedebilir misiniz?
Başlangıç olarak entegre raporun açık, net ve anlaşılabilir bir dili olması gerektiğine inanıyorum. Rapor, sadece yüksek eğitim seviyesine sahip olan kişiler veya raporu yayınlayan şirkete kaynak aktaran varlıklı aileler tarafından değil, sokaktaki her birey tarafından kolayca okunabilmeli ve anlaşılabilmeli…
Günümüzde finansal kaynakların önemli bir bölümünü, emeklilik fonları aracılığıyla sade vatandaşlar yaratmaktadır. Dolayısıyla fonun bir parçası ve aynı zamanda bir tüketici olan sade vatandaş, paydaşı oldukları şirketin sürdürülebilir iş modellerine yatırım yaptığını kavrayabilmeli.

Sizce, GRI ve Entegre Raporlama arasında temel farklılıklar nelerdir?
Açıkçası, GRI sürdürülebilirlik raporlamasına net kriter ve standartlar sunarken, entegre yaklaşımın net standart sunduğunu söylemek pek doğru olmaz. Entegre yaklaşım sadece bir çerçeve sunar; olması gereken içerikler ve yazım dilinin nasıl kullanılması gerektiği konusunda yönlendirmeler yapar. Böylece finansal ve finansal olmayan konuların birbirini nasıl etkilediğini vurgular ve uzun vadeye yayılan sürdürülebilirlik stratejisine nasıl bağlı kalındığının altını çizer.

Türkiye’de son dönemde sürdürülebilirlik konusunda yaşanan değişimi nasıl değerlendiriyorsunuz?
2006 yılından bu yana Türkiye’de birçok toplantı ve etkinlikte yer aldım. Kuşkusuz, sürdürülebilirlik konusunda farkındalığın ciddi şekilde arttığını gözlemliyorum. Sürdürülebilirliğin sadece itibar çalışması olarak görülmediğini ve şirketlerin gerçekten performanslarını artırmak ve geleceğe dair “iyi işler” yapmak için kendilerini geliştirdiklerini görmek gerçekten mutluluk verici…

Sürdürülebilirlik raporu hazırlamak için girişimde bulunan şirket veya kurumlara tavsiyeleriniz nelerdir?
Öncelikle paydaşların çıkar, ihtiyaç ve beklentileri konusunda yönetim kurulunun ortak bir akıl oluşturması gerekiyor. Ardından söz konusu şirketin iş alanıyla ilgili olan sürdürülebilirlik konularını belirlemek ve işin itici gücünü merkezde tutmak gerekiyor. Son olarak, sürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımının şirketin uzun vadeli stratejisine nasıl uyumlu hale getirileceğinin yollarının bulunması gerekiyor.

Şirketler veya markalar, sürdürülebilirlik konusunda nasıl rol model olabilirler?
Bence şirketler attıkları her adımla artık topluma iyi veya kötü örnek oluyorlar. Çağımızda şirketler veya markalar “örnek kurum” olma zorunluğu taşıyor. Aksi takdirde önce paydaşlar yani tüketiciler daha sonra ise sivil toplum tarafından dışlanıyorlar. Sivil toplum, artık kar uğruna insan haklarından ödün veren veya doğaya zarar veren şirketleri kabul etmiyor. Greenpeace’in KitKat kampanyası bunun en iyi örneklerinden birini oluşturuyor.
Şirketler artık sadece mali/finansal konuları baz alarak hareket etmemeli. Günümüzde her şirket 6 kaynak kullanır: Finansal, üretim bazlı, insan, doğal, entelektüel ve sosyal kaynaklar.
Şirketlerin fonksiyonlarını ilgilendiren tüm bu kaynaklar ilişkilidir ve birbirlerinden bağımsız hareket edemezler. Dolayısıyla şirket yönetimlerinin strateji geliştirirken entegre düşünce yapısına sahip olmaları gerekmektedir.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Markalar için yeni bir araç: SM Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi

Tina LY.


DowJones, CAC40, FTSE ve İMKB’den sonra markalar hayatlarına bir endeks daha katarak, performansın ölçüldüğü sosyal medya sürdürülebilirlik endeksini de mercek altına almalı.
Arkadaşlarınızdan ve sosyal çevrenizden benzer sorular işitiyorsunuz:

Foursquare’de check-in olduğum mekâna gittin mi? Facebook’ta otomobil hediye eden markanın sayfasını gördün mü? Twitter’dan duyurduğu indirim kampanyasından haberin var mı? Instagram’dan çektiğim yeni ürün fotoğrafını beğendin mi?” Üç yıl önce bu sorularla pek karşılaşmıyordunuz. Artık belki de her gün duyuyorsunuz.
Sosyal medya, her alanda olduğu gibi “sürdürülebilirlik” konusunda da şirketlerin ve markaların temel iletişim aracı olarak ön plana çıkıyor. Günümüzde iletişimi tanımlayacak öncelikli anahtar kelimeler olarak “katılım, özgünlük, şeffaflık ve topluluk” sıralanabilir.
Sosyal medya aracılığıyla şirketler, tüketiciler de dahil olmak üzere paydaşlarını “anlık” operasyonları konusunda bilgilendirerek tüm sürecin bir parçası olduklarını hissettirebiliyor ve daha da önemlisi sonuçlarda rolleri olduğunu gösterebiliyor.
Mesajların etkisi
Social Media Influence (SMI)  kurucusu Matthew  Yeomans, özellikle de sürdürülebilirlik konusunda sosyal medyanın önemli açılımlar sağladığını vurgulayarak “Yeni sosyal teknolojiler iletişimin yapısını tamamen değiştirdi. İnsanlara seslerinin önemli olduğunu ve gerçekten değişime katkı sağladıklarını hissettirebiliyorsunuz” diyor.  Şirket ve markaların sürdürülebilirlik konusunda attıkları adımların iletişimine dair verdikleri mesajların etkisini ölçmek daha önemli hale geliyor. Bu noktada SMI Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi devreye giriyor.   Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi’nde global ölçekte en büyük pazar değerine sahip 400 şirketin sürdürülebilirlik konusunda yürüttükleri aktif iletişim kampanyaları ve sosyal medyada olan yansımaları analiz ediliyor. Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi’nde kriterlere uyan yani aktif sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi yapan 176 şirket yer alıyor. Geçtiğimiz yıl bu sayı 120 seviyesindeydi.
Endeksin kriterleri
Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi’nde şirket ve markaların, çevre konusunda attıkları adımlar konusunda bir yorum yapılmıyor veya projelere yönelik raporlar bilimsel yöntemlerle değerlendirilmiyor.

adece ama sadece sürdürülebilirlik iletişim kampanyalarının etkisi ölçülüyor. Kriterlere kısaca bakacak olursak, “Kurumlar sürdürülebilirlik hakkında hangi sıklıkta içerik yayınlıyor? Kullanıcılarla sosyal ağlar üzerinden etkileşime geçiyorlar mı? Etkileşim oranları ne? Kullanıcıların yorumlarını şeffaflıkla yayınlıyorlar mı? İçerikleri ne kadar inovatif ve özgün? Yarattıkları içeriklerde faydalı bilgi yer alıyor mu? İçeriklerinin etki alanının büyüklüğü ne? Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporları ne kadar ‘sosyal’?” ilk sıralarda yer alıyor.
Kısacası, Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi, bir organizasyonun sürdürülebilirlik iletişimini kıyaslamaya yarayan önemli bir bilgi kaynağı ve kıyaslama aracı olarak kullanılabilir. Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi ayrıca dünya genelinde iyi uygulamaları, vaka analizlerini ve sosyal medya başarısızlıklarını gösteren örnekler de sunuyor.
Lider şirketler
Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi’nde Levi’s, BBVA, eBay ve Danone gibi şirketler ilk sıralarda yer alıyor. Dünya genelinden 176 kurumun arasında 48 şirket ile ABD ilk sırada bulunuyor. İngiltere’den 12, Fransa’dan 11 ve Almanya’dan 5 şirket endekste yer alıyor. Çevre kirliliğine duyarsızlıkla tanınan Çinli şirketler listede yer almıyor. Fakat sosyal medya kullanımının en aktif olduğu ülkelerin başında yer alan Türkiye’den henüz tek bir şirket veya markaya da endekste rastlanmıyor. Belki de şimdi  daha faydalı iletişim yapmanın zamanı gelmiştir, ne dersiniz?

Sosyal Medya Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi hakkına detaylı bilgi almak için şuraya göz atabilirsiniz.

Kaynak: Campaign Türkiye Mart 2013.

SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index: THE index to focus on

By Tina LY.



DowJones, CAC40, FTSE ,IMKB, and the like are so many indexes that organizations are following to get an idea of their business environment. But the one, organizations should really focus on for their sustainability communication is probably SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index.

Every day, doesn’t your entourage ask you: “Have you been to the place I checked in in Foursquare? Did you see this company’s page on Facebook, there is a contest to win a car? Did you see on Twitter this Company is launching a discount campaign? Did you check out my Instagram? Etc.” Questions not so common just 3 years ago.

Go social a trend? No rather a MUST
Social media has become an essential means of communication if not THE means to use, especially in the area of sustainability. The key word defining today’s communication are: contribution, authenticity, transparency, community. Through social media, organizations are involving their stakeholders through “live” operations, which make them feel as part of the whole process and result.  As said Matthew Yeomans, co-founder of Social Media Influence and director of Custom Communication, a social media sustainability consultancy,  “By empowering people with the sensibility that their voice matters and can make a difference, social media technologies have changed forever the way people communicate and act online.”

SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index: TOP 10
The SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index considered their ranking on a base of 400 companies using social media channel for communication with a focus on communicating sustainability. Of the 400, 176 appeared to have matched the criteria, and were ranked. This is an encouraging number, as it increased compared to 2011: 120 companies were counted.

However, the SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index does not aim to give an opinion on sustainability actions made by companies, but evaluate how those actions are communicated successfully through social media. Thus, as written on https://publisher.wizness.com/, social media sustainability communications of companies were assessed based on:
1-      How often they publish, update their sustainability social media channels?
2-      How transparent they are in allowing comments and responding to comments and conversation?
3-      How authentic is their social media content? Do they communicate what the company is doing or what it says it would like to do?
4-      How creative and innovative is the social media content?
5-      How useful is the information and conversation to the community?
6-      How "social" is the Sustainability or Corporate Responsibility Report?

From this ranking, here is an overview of the Top 10 of 2012:
2012 Position
Company Name
Sector
Out of 100
2011 Position
Rank Variation
1
Levi Strauss
Consumer Goods
92
8
7
2
BBVA.
Financials
91
5
3
3
eBay
Technology
90
New Entry
New Entry
4
Danone
Consumer Goods
89
13
9
5
General Electric
Industrial Goods & Services
89
1
-4
6
Telefonica
Telecommunciations
88
30
24
7
IBM
Technology
87
2
-5
8
Marks & Spencer Group
Consumer Goods
86
New Entry
New Entry
9
FedEx
Industrial Goods & Services
86
11
2
10
Microsoft.
Technology
84
29
19


Follow the Green Twitterati
The Green Twitterati is a list of 100 top tweeters accounts that are dedicated to sustainability and business, updated every 6 months. Accounts are from categorized based on their sector: media, agencies and consultants, companies, government and academia.  

SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index: a tool for benchmark and measure organization’s performance
SMI-Wizness Social Media Sustainability Index provides data related to social media best practices and failures communication campaigns of companies. It is a very useful source of information to benchmark organization performance all over the world.

The breakdown of the top 100 companies included in the 2012 Index is as follows:


But where is Turkey? Let’s see if in the 2013 index a Turkish company will be part of it…